The real insight that changed everything for our clients wasn't picking a side in this debate. It was recognising that different phases of AI implementation require fundamentally different approaches.
After implementing generative AI solutions across enterprise clients, we've discovered that the traditional "build versus buy" framework creates a false choice that often leads organisations down costly paths, whether they choose external APIs like Open AI, Anthropic etc or attempt full custom development from day one using open source foundation models like Llama and Deepseek
The real insight that changed everything for our clients wasn't picking a side in this debate. It was recognising that different phases of AI implementation require fundamentally different approaches.
When executives ask whether to build or buy AI capabilities, they're usually trying to solve several challenges simultaneously: speed to market, cost control, data sovereignty, and competitive differentiation. Conventional approaches force you to optimise for one at the expense of others.
API-first strategies deliver rapid prototyping but create vendor dependencies and escalating costs as you scale. Custom-build approaches promise control and long-term economics but require significant upfront investment and technical skills. Both approaches often fail because they ignore how AI requirements evolve from exploration to production.
This hybrid methodology transforms how organisations think about AI investment. Rather than gambling on uncertain technical approaches, you're building capabilities systematically whilst managing risk at each stage. The risk comes from dependence on external APIs, what happens if the model provider changes their underlying models which results in a slight change in the output of your application? Who manages risk when you share your customers data to third party APIs?
Are you ok letting your input token being used to further train the Third party model? As an extreme case, what is your risk mitigation strategy if model provider decide to block your API requests?
Capability comparison across key dimensions (1-10 scale) - API-based agents excel at speed and support, while self-hosted agents provide superior control and workflow customisation
Building AI systems across multiple enterprise deployments has taught us that successful implementations follow a natural progression. Smart organisations prototype fast and transition strategically, rather than committing to a single approach from the beginning. At Evolve, we follo the below approach to delivering a successful Gen AI project :
We begin every engagement using enterprise APIs to accelerate proof-of-concept development. This approach delivers results 3X faster than custom development, allowing teams to validate core functionality and secure stakeholder buy-in whilst keeping initial investment manageable. During this phase, you're essentially buying speed and reducing execution risk.
Once the business value is proven, we guide organisations through a planned transition to open-source implementations. This transition delivers complete data sovereignty whilst your team develops deep technical capabilities in parallel. The knowledge gained during prototyping makes this transition far more predictable than attempting custom development from scratch.
The final phase achieves full open-source deployment with approximately 65% cost savings compared to API-dependent solutions, whilst maintaining the performance and capability advantages discovered during prototyping.
Organisations following this hybrid path develop three critical advantages: rapid innovation capabilities from mastering API integration, deep technical expertise from guided open-source development, and strategic independence from owning their production systems.
Most importantly, this approach builds institutional knowledge rather than vendor dependency. Your team understands exactly how your AI systems work because they've been involved in every transition decision, from initial API selection through custom optimisation.
The difference this makes becomes clear when you need to adapt your AI capabilities for new requirements, debug complex issues, or integrate with existing systems. You're not dependent on external providers or mysterious black-box solutions—you own both the technology and the expertise to evolve it.
Ready to explore how this hybrid approach applies to your specific AI requirements? Our strategic assessment helps you understand which phase aligns with your current needs and how to build towards long-term AI capabilities whilst delivering immediate business value.
Learn how Australian businesses are maximising value from their AI investments with Evolve bespoke solutions
ROI
Faster processing
Faster documentation
We build a custom solution to maximise your business revenue, reduce costs and add operational efficiency
Speak to an expert